|
The News -
Latest News
|
|
Written by pp news correspondent
|
|
Wednesday, 12 March 2008 |
 |
The beautiful cover above was created by Hala Zabaneh. Visit her site to see her other works.
|
The news just keeps on coming. Since "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" is so freakin' long the powers-that-be have decided, for creative purpose (ahem) to cut the upcoming (in 2010) film in two. The thing is so huge, there's no way the book can be served properly with one movie. All the other books had plenty of fluff to cut out, while fans mourn the loss of some of that fluff, but with book 7 - it's solid action through and through.
"I think it's the only way you can do it without cutting out a huge portion of the book," Dan Radcliffe told the LA Times during a break in the filming of "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. "There have been compartmentalized subplots in the other books that have made them easier to cut -- although those cuts were still to the horror of some fans -- but the seventh book doesn't really have any subplots. It's one driving, pounding story from the word go."
The movies will be entitled "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" to be released Nov. 2010 and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2" to be released May 2011.
The Times also reported: "I swear to you it was born out of purely creative reasons," Heyman said during an interview in a converted airplane factory outside London that has been home base to all of the "Potter" productions. "Unlike every other book, you cannot remove elements of this book. You can remove scenes of Ron playing quidditch from the fifth book, and you can remove Hermione and S.P.E.W. [Society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare] and those subplots . . . but with the seventh, that can't be done."
To read more click here.
To see a cool interactive, relational map click here.
| | This item includes 3 comments |
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 13 March 2008 )
|
|
The News -
Latest News
|
|
Written by pp news correspondent
|
|
Wednesday, 12 March 2008 |
|
A howler to now former Governor of New York, Eliot Spitzer: Oy, Eliot! By now the entire world knows of your alleged indescretions with a prostitute. And after all you had done for the state of New York, for the Democratic party and for the chance that you might've had to run for President some day. What a shlemiel. I'm plotzing here. We'll let the courts and the media battle the rest of it all out. And to tell you the truth, the only reason PP is on the scene is because of this line from "Radioactive Liberty " dissing on the Spitz:
Spitzer Scandal is a Comedy Gold Rush
This sort of scandal is almost like the Holy Grail of parody and satire. A high ranking political official makes a name for himself as a tough-on-crime prosecutor. He gets elected Governor, promising to clean out the corruption. Then, the grande finale.
Spitzer gets caught with his pants down. He got his hand caught in the cookie jar. He got his Harry Potter caught in the sorcerer's stone.
|
It made us wonder just how many times a man's johnson has been referred to as his "harry potter..." Anyone have any ideas?
| | This item includes 2 comments |
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 12 March 2008 )
|
|
|
The News -
Latest News
|
|
Written by PimpMe
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 2008 |
|
Tilda Swinton, the actress you might or might not know as the evil White Witch in the Chronicles of Narnia movies, has let the world know that if she's ever asked to be in a Harry Potter movie, which no one has ever done, she would have to politely decline.
Straight from her mouth:
"I'm loath to say anything good about going to boarding school, which is one of the reasons why I'm not a believer in Harry Potter. Because I believe it fetishizes boarding school for children."
Hmmm...well, for starters, I've never really understood people when they say that they don't "believe" in Harry Potter because it kind of exists, so don't you kind of have to believe?...
Anyway...I do have to admit that I like how the Hogwarts boarding school is portrayed in the Harry Potter books. It seems like a fun, scary, and cool place to be to me, although I have always had a soft spot for boarding schools - don't know why though, I had a good time growing up in my home, but anyway moving on!
The other thing that confuzzles me is if boarding schools are shown as good things, then what's so bad about "fetishizing" them, Tilda?...
Source (and well worth a read!): Holy Moly
| | This item includes 3 comments |
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 25 March 2008 )
|
|
|
The News -
Latest News
|
|
Written by PimpMe
|
|
Monday, 10 March 2008 |
|
All right, so it's not Dan Radcliffe saying he's a geek but this article from GreatReporter.com.
"Hodgman's cult following marks the rise of a new brand of cool - geek chic. In a society obsessed with makeovers, the "geek" has remained unabashedly himself: earnest, awkward, bumbling. And he's finally getting noticed. Hollywood's latest stars like Michael Cera, Daniel Radcliffe, Jason Schwartzman and Hodgman, the poster-boy for the movement, have recast the leading man and changed public perception. Cutting across all sectors - from media to retail - the nerd figure has come to power."
Do I see Dan as an "earnest, awkward, bumbling" geek/nerd type? Hmmm....actually I think I do.... but it's cool 'cause it's chic!
| | This item includes 7 comments |
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 25 March 2008 )
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 37 - 45 of 98 |